Maintaining Adequate Spill Containment Systems In The Workplace
February 6, 2011 by Rathi Niyogi
Filed under Uncategorized
A work area spill of toxic or hazardous agents can be a scary state for all concerned. The natural impulse for nearly all people when they recognize a discharge happening is to do their best to intervene and try to rectify the problem themselves. Unfortunately, this is nearly always the incorrect course of action – workers should in no way put themselves in a hazardous situation by attempting to actually halt or slow up a unsafe spill. This ought to be noticeably outlined in the course of spill containment training sessions with any workers who are exposed to hazardous agents during the process of conducting their duties.
Of course there is no replacement for the acceptable equipment. Spill pallets and spill berms should be on hand and in use as a primary safeguard against spill hazards. The main weapon that a risk administrator can deploy against the issues posed by spills is in the proper management of production and storage areas where spills are most likely to take place. Transportation corridors must also receive the similar sort of attention. If a spilled substance can be safely channeled into secure temporary or disaster holding spaces that are away from sparks, open flames, electrical circuits or employees then there is no requirement for staff to do something other than de-activate their device and leave the area in the event of a spill.
External storage tanks, be they for oil, gasoline or other types of chemical storage are often targets for overfilling or deterioration, both of which can cause leaking. The use of diking encompassing these tanks in order to collect spills and prevent the distribution of possibly flammable, corrosive or otherwise harmful liquids is recommended by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and in some conditions may in fact be mandated by law, depending on the volume of the tank being used. The need for these types of dikes and barriers can also be associated to the quantity of vehicular traffic in the storage space itself. Make sure that OSHA rules do not explicitly prohibit the installation of dikes near the container, as they do for those controlling certain chemicals such as liquefied petroleum gas.
In addition to dikes and barriers, OSHA also suggests the use of diatomaceous earth when controlling spills. Spreading this chalk-like substance is a proven technique of sopping up potentially treacherous liquids. If workers can carefully utilize diatomaceous earth via proscribed steps as an element of an disaster response plan that does not put them in any peril, then this may well be a competent option for containing a spill.
There are also chemicals existing which can be sprayed in the course of a spill through pressurized applicators that allow your workforce to keep their distance. These particular materials can not only hamper the progress of a spreading substance, but also reduce the effects of any fumes or even completely solidify the substance in question. At their most efficient, these agents not only harden a material, but also chemically change its combustibility so that it can be safely disposed of once the danger is over. Fast-acting agents can even be utilized to produce impromptu barriers as they can affect the primary edge of a spill to swiftly lose its fluidity.
Author’s Note: Previously published here.
…
Rathi Niyogi is the CEO of CriticalTool, a national distributor of Spill Pallets and Spill Containment Berms and other safety products. If you thought this article was helpful, additional information on safety storage can be found at http://www.IndustrialSafetyCabinets.com/
Read more articles written by Rathi Niyogi
Developing A Facility Response Plan To Comply With the EPA
January 26, 2011 by Rathi Niyogi
Filed under Uncategorized
The EPA has been very proactive in requiring businesses, both large and small, to adhere to standards that prevent pollution activities through oil and chemical spills. Since August 1990, in response to public outrage over the Exxon Valdez incident, the Oil Pollution Act has been a law that puts the responsibility of prevention on industry. This law includes the requirement for businesses to file a Facility Response Plan (FRP) with the EPA.
The FRP requirement is specifically designed for businesses that meet certain conditions:
1.The facility has a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 42,000 gallons and transfers oil over water to/from vessels; or
2.The facility has a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to one million gallons AND meets ONE of the following conditions:
The EPA also considers whether a facility could cause substantial harm to the surrounding environment in the event of a spill or discharge or oil or chemicals into navigable waters, shorelines, or other groundwater. There are several test factors to assist in determining “substantial harm,” including storage of tanks, age of tanks and drums, drum management, oil and chemical transfer methods, as well as location.
The most efficient way of providing a sound FRP is to demonstrate ownership and use of proper spill containment equipment. This equipment can include overpack drums, spill pallets, oil drum racks and trucks, and spill containment berms.
Your FRP should include your current oil and chemical management plan to demonstrate worker training on spill prevention, with emphasis on their understanding of the correct use of the spill protection equipment within your facility. These things include storage of drums on drum pallets or spill pallets, use of drum racks for dispensing oil into safety cans, as well as working with oil storage tanks within the confines of a spill containment berm and the use of overpack drums for older drums and potentially-leaking drums.
Depending on your facility layout and workplan and your state’s FRP requirements, your FRP may not be exactly the same as another business. You can contact your EPA Regional Administrator to for more information to assist in the development of your FRP.
Previously published here.
…
Rathi Niyogi is the CEO of CriticalTool, a national distributor of industrial equipment. If you thought this article was helpful, additional information on spill containment products can be found at http://www.IndustrialSafetyCabinets.com/
Read more articles written by Rathi Niyogi
Bloodborne Pathogens For Nonhealthcare Settings
December 7, 2010 by Rathi Niyogi
Filed under Uncategorized
Hospitals and health care facilities have a great deal of practice at handling incidents where employees may be exposed to bloodborne pathogens. However, if you’re not working in a health care setting, chances are your employees aren’t as experienced in bloodborne pathogen incidents. Here are some tips to help prevent exposure incidents at your facility:
Author’s Note: This article published here.
…
Rathi Niyogi is the CEO of CriticalTool, a national distributor of Nitrile Gloves, Latex Gloves and other safety products. If you thought this article was helpful, additional information on gloves can be found at http://www.criticaltool.com/work-gloves.html
Read more articles written by Rathi Niyogi
The ANSI Standard – Operation and Maintenance
November 21, 2010 by Rathi Niyogi
Filed under Uncategorized
OSHA regulations set out where eyewash stations should be and when they are required; they do not provide operating requirements. However, some state-level health and safety regulations specifically incorporate the ANSI standard and so make the provisions of the standard a regulatory requirement.
Operation
The ANSI standard for emergency eyewash stations include:
Maintenance and Training
Author’s Note: This article also published here.
…
Rathi Niyogi is the CEO of CriticalTool, a national distributor of eye wash stations and other eye wash products. If you thought this article was helpful, additional information on chemical resistant gloves can be found at different types of eye wash stations can be found here http://www.criticaltool.com/types-of-eye-wash-stations.html
Read more articles written by Rathi Niyogi
Choosing Rainwear
November 9, 2010 by Rathi Niyogi
Filed under Uncategorized
Rainwear does more than simply keep out rain or snow, it protects from wind, cold, and chemical splashes. Your choice of rainwear depends on the expected weather, the expected temperatures, your planned activities, and your budget. Rainwear materials and designs greatly affect the performance you can expect. There are three major types of rainwear:
Water-Resistant / Breathable
Water-resistant/breathable rainwear repels wind and light precipitation while providing excellent breathability to keep you cool when your body heats up. It relies on durable water repellent (DWR) finishes applied by the manufacturer. It tends to be lighter, less bulky, and less expensive than other rainwear. It is generally not adequately weatherproof to protect you in harsh conditions or during extended periods of rain. It is appropriate for mild weather, light precipitation, and high activity levels. It is not appropriate as industrial safety equipment where protection from extreme weather or chemicals is needed.
Waterproof / Breathable
Waterproof/breathable rainwear provides an excellent choice for a wide range of weather conditions and activities. The combination of breathability and moisture protection through DWR finishes means that you can use a single piece of gear in both warm and cold conditions. The exact performance that you realize from waterproof/breathable rainwear depends on the fabrics used, Gore-Tex being a well-known example, and your activity level. Because water vapor (i.e., sweat) is able to escape through the fabric, the rainwear provides the best combination of repelling the elements while allowing you to stay comfortable as you work. Waterproof/breathable garments are generally not appropriate safety equipment for industrial applications.
Waterproof / Nonbreathable
Waterproof/nonbreathable rainwear provides impermeable protection from the elements, wind, and chemical splashes; the greatest range of applications from lightweight disposable protection to durable protection designed for adverse conditions. Unlike DWR-dependent rainwear, nonbreathable rainwear is most commonly protected using PVC coatings that provide protection against chemical spills, durability, and, in some cases, flame retardant properties. Others are protected using neoprene to provide chemical resistance not found in PVC and improved comfort. Waterproof/nonbreathable rainwear offers cost-effective, durable protection suitable to most industrial applications.
Features to Consider
Rainwear Care
Rainwear that is dependent on a DWR finish applied by the fabric manufacturer should always be maintained according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Over time, the DWR finish will begin to wear and the shell will begin “wetting out” in the rain. This means that some of the rain is soaking into the material, rather than beading up and rolling off. Wetting out causes the shell to become heavier and reduces breathability. When wetting out is observed, the DWR should be renewed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Rainwear made from materials such as neoprene can often be repaired when leaking occurs. Always follow manufacturer’s recommendations for repair of small tears and seams.
Also published here.
…
Rathi Niyogi is the CEO of CriticalTool, a national distributor of safety vests and other reflective apparel. If you thought this article was helpful, information on the basics of Reflective Clothing including Rainwear and ANSI standards can be found here http://www.criticaltool.com/high-visibility-reflective-clothing-the-basics.html



